RT @blattnerma: The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics #wikipedia #statistics http:/…
@luis_in_brief @cfiesler @ThomasDFish @WikiWomenInRed @WikiResearch Closest study I can think of: https://t.co/id392T2tP8. I don't think they looked into gender but that would be a really interesting dimension to explore using similar methods.
RT @TahaYasseri: How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eq…
RT @TahaYasseri: How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eq…
RT @TahaYasseri: How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eq…
RT @TahaYasseri: How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eq…
RT @peterdalle: "Wikipedia might be producing an inaccurate image of academics on the front end of science" https://t.co/dmD80B5ZSn #medief…
RT @peterdalle: "Wikipedia might be producing an inaccurate image of academics on the front end of science" https://t.co/dmD80B5ZSn #medief…
"Wikipedia might be producing an inaccurate image of academics on the front end of science" https://t.co/dmD80B5ZSn #medieforskning
RT @TahaYasseri: How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eq…
RT @TahaYasseri: How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eq…
RT @TahaYasseri: How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eq…
RT @TahaYasseri: How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eq…
RT @TahaYasseri: How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eq…
Fighting words. *gets popcorn before reading* https://t.co/cFNE1ZIxUB
RT @TahaYasseri: How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eq…
How Wikipedia fails to cover academics in a fair manner despite being #1 source of free information online https://t.co/eqSgFCOHRi @epj_ds
The distorted mirror of #Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics https://t.co/ElOC2VHaoi #epjdatascience
@joewass Can the thing the shortened URL points to change? I.e. can http://t.co/WV0X9B5jzQ point to a different DOI in a month?
@juretriglav It's a link shortener not an ID. You can just make a head request to http://t.co/k6aUpnF1KW and get back the link header.
@juretriglav official short form of a DOI. E.g. http://t.co/k6aUpnF1KW is short for http://t.co/aBiHxSj8nd see http://t.co/QgbsDwo6Dx
RT @pj_webster: EPJ Data Science | The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.c…
EPJ Data Science | The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/H4aR4U5nJ5
RT @dullhunk: “The distorted mirror of #Wikipedia” analysis of academic coverage http://t.co/zPUx6RnRKn via @oiioxford @tahayasseri & John …
“The distorted mirror of #Wikipedia” analysis of academic coverage http://t.co/zPUx6RnRKn via @oiioxford @tahayasseri & John Byrne #wikisci
RT @TahaYasseri:Just realized that our EPJ Data Science PPt on "academics in Wikipedia" is "Highly Accessed" http://t.co/UtHluAEeza
Just realized that our EPJ Data Science paper on "academics in Wikipedia" is marked as "Highly Accessed" http://t.co/ax0sv4uBhS @EPJscience
科学者の引用数とウイキペディア記事の長さ、編集回数、リンク数に相関なし。The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia …http://t.co/N3cX0TVwfx
科学者の引用数とウイキペディア記事の長さ、編集回数、リンク数に相関なし。The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia …http://t.co/N3cX0TVwfx
No correlation of academic notability and Wikipedia presence -- a quantitative analysis by @AnnySml and @TahaYasseri http://t.co/FSR5fmewME
RT @cbpuschmann: No correlation of academic notability & Wikipedia entry: data analysis by @AnnySml + @TahaYasseri http://t.co/nUEUpXD5mF
No correlation of academic notability and Wikipedia presence -- a quantitative analysis by @AnnySml and @TahaYasseri http://t.co/FSR5fmewME
No correlation of academic notability and Wikipedia presence -- a quantitative analysis by @AnnySml and @TahaYasseri http://t.co/FSR5fmewME
No correlation of academic notability and Wikipedia presence -- a quantitative analysis by @AnnySml and @TahaYasseri http://t.co/FSR5fmewME
No correlation of academic notability and Wikipedia presence -- a quantitative analysis by @AnnySml and @TahaYasseri http://t.co/FSR5fmewME
"The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" scores 85 @altmetric! http://t.co/c2wDpeVpsw
"The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" scores 85 @altmetric! http://t.co/c2wDpeVpsw
Research @oiioxford shows academics' profiles on #Wikipedia don't mean shit http://t.co/QgzIEVWoA4
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: A quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/lTbAFK9vrP
[rss] "The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/ex1oKu9wed
Interesting article by @TahaYasseri: The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quant. analysis of WP coverage of academics http://t.co/Jgu0dh0ljT
Our paper on "Wikipedia coverage of academics" just published @ EPJ Data Science http://t.co/vHL0oDBp0D @EPJscience @oiioxford @WikiResearch
Is Wikipedia presence correlated with academic notability?No significant correlation found. http://t.co/cusA8ZjJaL via @EPJscience
Our paper on "Wikipedia coverage of academics" just published @ EPJ Data Science http://t.co/vHL0oDBp0D @EPJscience @oiioxford @WikiResearch
Is Wikipedia presence correlated with academic notability?No significant correlation found. http://t.co/cusA8ZjJaL via @EPJscience
Is Wikipedia presence correlated with academic notability?No significant correlation found. http://t.co/cusA8ZjJaL via @EPJscience
Is Wikipedia presence correlated with academic notability?No significant correlation found. http://t.co/cusA8ZjJaL via @EPJscience
Is Wikipedia presence correlated with academic notability?No significant correlation found. http://t.co/cusA8ZjJaL via @EPJscience
Is Wikipedia presence correlated with academic notability?No significant correlation found. http://t.co/cusA8ZjJaL via @EPJscience
Our paper on "Wikipedia coverage of academics" just published @ EPJ Data Science http://t.co/vHL0oDBp0D @EPJscience @oiioxford @WikiResearch
@TahaYasseri's new paper on "Wikipedia coverage of academics" jst published, EPJ DataScience http://t.co/UtHluAmDr6 @oiioxford @WikiResearch
Les + médiatiques ? MT @Karmacoma: Les chercheurs les mieux représentés sur Wikipédia n'ont pas le meilleur h-index http://t.co/582KCLmhMq
Les + médiatiques ? MT @Karmacoma: Les chercheurs les mieux représentés sur Wikipédia n'ont pas le meilleur h-index http://t.co/582KCLmhMq
Our paper on "Wikipedia coverage of academics" just published @ EPJ Data Science http://t.co/vHL0oDBp0D @EPJscience @oiioxford @WikiResearch
Our paper on "Wikipedia coverage of academics" just published @ EPJ Data Science http://t.co/vHL0oDBp0D @EPJscience @oiioxford @WikiResearch
@TahaYasseri's new paper on "Wikipedia coverage of academics" jst published, EPJ DataScience http://t.co/UtHluAmDr6 @oiioxford @WikiResearch
Our paper on "Wikipedia coverage of academics" just published @ EPJ Data Science http://t.co/vHL0oDBp0D @EPJscience @oiioxford @WikiResearch
Our paper on "Wikipedia coverage of academics" just published @ EPJ Data Science http://t.co/vHL0oDBp0D @EPJscience @oiioxford @WikiResearch
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/lOLNopuMTL
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics via @oiioxford http://t.co/LuYEgPKKb5
The distorted mirror of #Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of #academics http://t.co/W5rTlVfZhC #WikipediaMe
A quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/TbEHvkQ3Zf via .@TahaYasseri #wikiresearch #wikipedia CC: .@andicat
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: A quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/tOSH6m2P14
Does Your Professor Have a Wikipedia Entry? Congrats! It Means Nothing-The Atlantic http://t.co/ICJBWpTL9E full paper http://t.co/OMJXRl8npR
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/xK6UpuRJ3J HT @PhysicsToday
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/xK6UpuRJ3J HT @PhysicsToday
Wikipedia's portrayal of academics is inaccurate. http://t.co/PJLZxz2hS5
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/xK6UpuRJ3J HT @PhysicsToday
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/xK6UpuRJ3J HT @PhysicsToday
great read RT @SciBry: Does impressiveness of researcher's Wikipedia entry correlate with their academic notability? http://t.co/nCLzIhLOg6
MT @SciBry: Does impressiveness of a researcher's Wikipedia entry correlate with academic notability? http://t.co/gaIAF9jrD7 @Colvinius
RT @SciBry Does impressiveness of a researcher's Wikipedia entry correlate with their academic notability? Answer: http://t.co/zRTvb4u8Ii
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/xK6UpuRJ3J HT @PhysicsToday
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/5vqVD0Vhjp
pearler RT @SciBry: Does impressiveness of a researcher's Wikipedia entry correlate with their academic notability? http://t.co/9rxjUS3Pa0
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/xK6UpuRJ3J HT @PhysicsToday
great read RT @SciBry: Does impressiveness of researcher's Wikipedia entry correlate with their academic notability? http://t.co/nCLzIhLOg6
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/a54xGkzObu
Wikipedia's portrayal of academics is inaccurate. http://t.co/PJLZxz2hS5
"Wikipedia failed in covering notable scholars .. produces inaccurate image of academics on the front end of science" http://t.co/HQVL4GsnYx
Wikipedia's portrayal of academics is inaccurate. http://t.co/PJLZxz2hS5
Paper on #scienceofsuccess by @TahaYasseri Surprising "quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/fYcUUpHN9k
Preprint by Samoilenko & Yasseri: Little relation between scientists' citation by peers & presence in Wikipedia: http://t.co/u2srYdvA6o
Preprint by Samoilenko & Yasseri: Little relation between scientists' citation by peers & presence in Wikipedia: http://t.co/u2srYdvA6o
Distorted mirror of Wikipedia: quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/F7BB5uasIy
Preprint by Samoilenko & Yasseri: Little relation between scientists' citation by peers & presence in Wikipedia: http://t.co/u2srYdvA6o
Preprint by Samoilenko & Yasseri: Little relation between scientists' citation by peers & presence in Wikipedia: http://t.co/u2srYdvA6o
Distorted mirror of Wikipedia: quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/F7BB5uasIy
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics. http://t.co/xus51lyh6Y
Paper on #scienceofsuccess by @TahaYasseri Surprising "quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/fYcUUpHN9k
Paper on #scienceofsuccess by @TahaYasseri Surprising "quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/fYcUUpHN9k
Paper on #scienceofsuccess by @TahaYasseri Surprising "quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/fYcUUpHN9k
Paper on #scienceofsuccess by @TahaYasseri Surprising "quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/fYcUUpHN9k
Paper on #scienceofsuccess by @TahaYasseri Surprising "quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics" http://t.co/fYcUUpHN9k
[Preprint] Distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/cl2v4bSqcv @WikiResearch
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics #wikipedia #statistics http://t.co/ZhvXH3oSRJ
[Preprint] Distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/cl2v4bSqcv @WikiResearch
[Preprint] Distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/cl2v4bSqcv @WikiResearch
A quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/TbEHvkQ3Zf via .@TahaYasseri #wikiresearch #wikipedia CC: .@andicat
#altmetrics RT @TahaYasseri Distorted mirror of Wikipedia: A quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics http://t.co/nZHPzwzXn3