↓ Skip to main content

Moral Bioenhancement Probably Won’t Improve Things for Animals (and May Make Them Worse)

Overview of attention for article published in Topoi, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Moral Bioenhancement Probably Won’t Improve Things for Animals (and May Make Them Worse)
Published in
Topoi, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11245-017-9467-7
Authors

Bob Fischer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Unspecified 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Psychology 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#9,064,552
of 11,808,250 outputs
Outputs from Topoi
#110
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,500
of 267,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Topoi
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,808,250 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.