↓ Skip to main content

Wilderness Programs: Principles, Possibilities and Opportunities for Intervention with Dropout Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Child & Youth Care Forum, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Wilderness Programs: Principles, Possibilities and Opportunities for Intervention with Dropout Adolescents
Published in
Child & Youth Care Forum, April 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:ccar.0000019634.47226.ab
Authors

Shlomo Romi, Ezequiel Kohan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 29%
Social Sciences 14 27%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Child & Youth Care Forum
#204
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,865
of 64,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child & Youth Care Forum
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them