@ClimateFran @SciReports @DannyBressler1 @davidanthoff Has there been any work determining whether the current estimates for temperature-related mortality in IAMs is too high or too low? This gives an estimate, at least: https://t.co/iF9kwMFeNi
@AndrewDessler this paper has some useful analysis as well (complex issue). https://t.co/zaPcbntRs6
@mkeulemans @bart_braun Wat een onzin. Literatuur staat vol met zulk onderzoek. Elk onderzoek dat hogere mortaliteit door hitte onderzoekt moet wel de lagere mortaliteit door koud vermelden of onderzoeken. In econ. modellen is koude-effect zelfs vaak ster
RT @AnnaMvrg: It is often assumed that #cold-related #mortality reductions will overcompensate #heat-related mortality increases but the as…
It is often assumed that #cold-related #mortality reductions will overcompensate #heat-related mortality increases but the assumptions of existing projections need to be reexamined https://t.co/Saryxu0JpV #climatechange #health
@chriscmooney And we know how this will go. They’ll dredge up some old FUND results and concentrate on net benefits. But we know such results are generally not supported by later scholarship. Eg https://t.co/72cs9drvmG
RT @A_Siegel: Anyone else wondering why @RichardTol's work has so many problems with gremlins? https://t.co/BBEYeF5IOm #analysis #DismalSci…
@aDissentient Increasing mortality https://t.co/mdoFmKgdeJ
Anyone else wondering why @RichardTol's work has so many problems with gremlins? https://t.co/BBEYeF5IOm #analysis #DismalScience #economics #climate #EnvironmentalEconomics
RT @mammuthus: Possibly significant? Costs of climate change underestimated because of bias in temp-mortality damage functions https://t.co…
RT @mammuthus: @RozPidcock @coralsncaves @CarbonBrief This puts me in mind of another recent paper suggesting damage functions may underest…
RT @mammuthus: @RozPidcock @coralsncaves @CarbonBrief This puts me in mind of another recent paper suggesting damage functions may underest…
@RozPidcock @coralsncaves @CarbonBrief This puts me in mind of another recent paper suggesting damage functions may underestimate impact https://t.co/5ax3vEtJAF
@EthonRaptor @RichardTol @MLiebreich @BjornLomborg As well as a double counting on the cold side for elderly who would have died anyway. https://t.co/wCsaozfIOW https://t.co/VduDTU30Xl
RT @mammuthus: Possibly significant? Costs of climate change underestimated because of bias in temp-mortality damage functions https://t.co…
RT @mammuthus: Possibly significant? Costs of climate change underestimated because of bias in temp-mortality damage functions https://t.co…
Possibly significant? Costs of climate change underestimated because of bias in temp-mortality damage functions https://t.co/Y2hCTErrks
The old model predicts decrease of 380,000 deaths/°C. The new model predicts an increase of 150,000. https://t.co/gED04qkKla
RT @climatedynamics: I always get asked "Won't future decreases in cold related deaths far outweigh heat related death increases?" No. http…
RT @climatedynamics: I always get asked "Won't future decreases in cold related deaths far outweigh heat related death increases?" No. http…
RT @climatedynamics: I always get asked "Won't future decreases in cold related deaths far outweigh heat related death increases?" No. http…
RT @climatedynamics: I always get asked "Won't future decreases in cold related deaths far outweigh heat related death increases?" No. http…
I always get asked "Won't future decreases in cold related deaths far outweigh heat related death increases?" No. https://t.co/zaPcbntjCy
@AlexSteffen @granlund_aarne Or else based on FUND model which has its own problems. https://t.co/VduDTU30Xl
ALARMISTS SAY: Global warming of 1°C increases cardiovascular mortality by 150,000 net additional deaths globally … https://t.co/o3ZoUeew0t
RT @VariabilityBlog: Richard Tol's FUND: 380,000 less deaths from cardiovascular diseases per year at 1 °C of warming. New study: 150,000 n…
RT @geschichtenpost: Cold- & heat-related mortality: a cautionary note on current damage functions with net benefits from climate change ht…
RT @VariabilityBlog: Richard Tol's FUND: 380,000 less deaths from cardiovascular diseases per year at 1 °C of warming. New study: 150,000 n…
RT @VariabilityBlog: Richard Tol's FUND: 380,000 less deaths from cardiovascular diseases per year at 1 °C of warming. New study: 150,000 n…
Richard Tol's FUND: 380,000 less deaths from cardiovascular diseases per year at 1 °C of warming. New study: 150,000 net additional deaths. https://t.co/iLEfMq3NvF
RT @AGWobserver: Global warming of 1°C increases cardiovascular mortality by 150000 additional deaths globally per year https://t.co/xW3xYj…
Global warming of 1°C increases cardiovascular mortality by 150000 additional deaths globally per year https://t.co/xW3xYjHPva
Cold&heat related mortality -flaws in analysis imply bias finding net mortality benefits from #climatechange https://t.co/a8r1xIK55j #health
RT @geschichtenpost: Cold- & heat-related mortality: a cautionary note on current damage functions with net benefits from climate change ht…
Cold- & heat-related mortality: a cautionary note on current damage functions with net benefits from climate change https://t.co/QD9vORPbAA