Title |
Erratum to: Measuring Crime Concentration Across Cities of Varying Sizes: Complications Based on the Spatial and Temporal Scale Employed
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Quantitative Criminology, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10940-017-9349-6 |
Authors |
John R. Hipp, Young-An Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
Researcher | 5 | 22% |
Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 13 | 57% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 9% |
Mathematics | 2 | 9% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2017.
All research outputs
#19,597,115
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#475
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,240
of 314,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#16
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.