↓ Skip to main content

Threat of heavy metal contamination in eight mangrove plants from the Futian mangrove forest, China

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Geochemistry and Health, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Threat of heavy metal contamination in eight mangrove plants from the Futian mangrove forest, China
Published in
Environmental Geochemistry and Health, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10653-013-9574-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bei He, Ruili Li, Minwei Chai, Guoyu Qiu

Abstract

Mangrove plants play an important role in heavy metal maintenance in a mangrove ecosystem. To evaluate the characteristics of heavy metal contamination in the Futian mangrove forest, Shenzhen, China, eight heavy metals in mangrove sediments and plants were monitored, including essential elements such as Cu and Zn, and non-essential elements such as Cr, Ni, As, Cd, Pb and Hg. The results showed that the heavy metals exhibited the following scheme: Zn > As > Cu ≈ Cr > Pb > Ni > Cd ≈ Hg in sediment cores, among which Cd, As, Pb and Hg contents were nearly ten times higher than the background values. There was no significant difference in metal maintenance capability between native and exotic species. In mangrove plants' leaves and stems, concentrations of Cu, Zn and As were higher than other heavy metals. The low bioconcentration factors for most heavy metals, except for Cr, implied the limited ability of heavy metal accumulation by the plants. Mangrove plants seem to develop some degree of tolerance to Cr. The factor analysis implies that anthropogenic influences have altered metal mobility and bioavailability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 22%
Engineering 6 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2013.
All research outputs
#19,382,126
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geochemistry and Health
#640
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,398
of 210,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geochemistry and Health
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.