@icarus62 @_ClimateCraze GISTEMP is less reliable than UAH 6: https://t.co/PXYyyyJkxj And yes, global warming is slowing down: https://t.co/Avec69B7NR
@Jeppespip @_ClimateCraze GISTEMP is less reliable than UAH 6: https://t.co/PXYyyyJkxj And yes, global warming is slowing down: https://t.co/Avec69B7NR
@jimdtweet @_ClimateCraze GISTEMP is less reliable than UAH 6: https://t.co/PXYyyyJkxj And yes, global warming is slowing down: https://t.co/Avec69B7NR
@BurgessPark2 @GlenIrvine1 @curryja @SenTedCruz It's not a blog at all: it's an interactive graph site. In any event would you prefer the horse's mouth (Roy Spencer, the lead scientist of the UAH team)? https://t.co/pN4S4BdTNI
@RickWoollams @RARohde I think UAH 6.0 dates back to 2015: https://t.co/1M8gQsRXJ5
@ykubota68646994 ええっと、また爆死していらっしゃいます。話題の図はlower troposphereの温度を測ったものです。気温なんですよ、これは。そんなものは原理的に測り得ない?よろしい、査読論文書いてくださいよ。 https://t.co/rDDZvTjaPw
@JR4_Truth @hausfath You willfully peddle misinformation on climate science, just as you did on COVID-19, vaccines, etc. FYI: Due to the negative lapse rate feedback, annual temp spikes will be amplified in the bulk troposphere relative to the near surfac
@TonyPrep @hausfath @keanfei47 The UAH team's adjustments were criticized, in keeping with their decades-long history of poor adjustments. https://t.co/SINUbVCF2s https://t.co/mGG9j5dcTt https://t.co/iVeN5W5B2k https://t.co/GJiNIr6gEj https://t.co/yV4sxk
@dodders75 @hausfath @CarbonBrief I'm not interested in unsourced images or nonsense you pull off of non-peer-reviewed denialist blogs like Climate4You, especially when you're lying about the UAH analysis. https://t.co/beFaAfOYRW https://t.co/GG2SEd0qWA
@EricWil06256732 @juriansan1 @GeraldKutney https://t.co/2p0pvGUrXl You don't object when sceptics do it
@EricWil06256732 @juriansan1 @GeraldKutney https://t.co/bYCkvbQtQC 1) most of the members of these orgs aren't climate scientists and cant be 'dismissed' 2) the 'sceptics' adjust data all the time
@TullimonstrumC https://t.co/H1tC9TuuvX Follow the link
@TullimonstrumC https://t.co/H1tC9TuuvX So its wring when Spencer and Christy do it too? Great. No sceptic can ever refer to the highly adjusted satellite data ever again.
@TullimonstrumC https://t.co/WMfEhPFdql Data adjustments? Like the ones sceptics make?
@RARohde @StevenMBelknap @theresphysics @RSarava @PatrickTBrown31 @ClimateOfGavin I thought UAH also adopted a different algorithm for inferring the lower troposphere temperatures with the 6.0 revision to get more granular spatial data. Or did I misinterpr
https://t.co/PE4QLnZolQ Data adjustments
'But but but they adjusted the data!! That's not science!' 1) tell Spencer and Christy that. They do it all the time. And, if you still insist adjustments are invalid, stop referring to UAH. https://t.co/05mcpF5GFi https://t.co/lJgNCRVR5d
RT @MarijnMrn: Joris for king 🎉 https://t.co/FL2PPF0zJC
Joris for king 🎉
Bon, Joris (@JorisMeys) doet zijn naam weer alle eer aan ... als de koene ridder die de draak van de #klimaatontkenners overmeestert 😉 https://t.co/FafUIH2B7l
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @sales_un @RealRogerDodger @Jaisans @realBadea @ChrisMartzWX Re: "Graph comes from @ChrisMartzWX where I imagine Roy so…
@sales_un @RealRogerDodger @Jaisans @realBadea @ChrisMartzWX Re: "Graph comes from @ChrisMartzWX where I imagine Roy sourced it from" And now you're simply lying. https://t.co/8dbvVv2hkM
@sales_un @RealRogerDodger @Jaisans @realBadea @ChrisMartzWX Re: "Where did he get it from?" You don't know who actually makes the UAH analysis you cited, do you? This is one of the problems with many of you denialists: you mindlessly parrot things u see
@GeorgeLidis Re: "They do not define mid-troposphere, lower-stratosphere etc. Which vertical levels exactly are they? + The tropopause has multiple definitions." My guess is that they used the same definitions as the UAH team did: https://t.co/GG2SEcIQ52
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @Prudro01 Re: "I said they were mostly pursuing research that proves man made CO2 will cause a catastrophe" Yet they f…
@Prudro01 Re: "Then aggressively attacking via PR and lawfare anyone who publishes against the consensus" Oh, looks like you're dishonestly pretending that providing research funding for someone is "aggressively attacking" them. 😂 https://t.co/mFLWHxR5DL
@Prudro01 Re: "I said they were mostly pursuing research that proves man made CO2 will cause a catastrophe" Yet they funded the work of denialists/contrarians like Christy, Curry, Spencer, Pielke, etc. Think before you tweet. https://t.co/uBhB4uocqt htt
@strategyrick @KHayhoe The satellite methodology is extensively covered in the paper below. Roy Spencer's site has a non-paywall version. Certainly, she should be woken - but if you had a history of mistaking brake lights for flames, she'd be right to ask
@Zerilos Re: "This is why he published through UAH rather than have it peer reviewed" It was peer-reviewed, just placed in a low-tier journal https://t.co/YuTRn73iXu
RT @AtomsksSanakan: Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci, the go-to journal for contrarian nonsense from Lindzen, Christy, Spencer, etc.: https://t.co/…
Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci, the go-to journal for contrarian nonsense from Lindzen, Christy, Spencer, etc.: https://t.co/uFnWpoIMyL DOI: 10.1007/s13143-014-0011-z : https://t.co/UaVwKg4dtL DOI: 10.1007/s13143-011-0023-x : https://t.co/vNEWv4EaGZ https://t.c
3F/y John Christy is government-funded: "This research was supported by U.S. Department of Energy contract DE-SC0012638." https://t.co/GG2SEcIQ52 https://t.co/gUIsFawhvi
3B/y Roy Spencer is government-funded: "As part of a *DOE contract* we have, we will be examining 183 GHz measurements of upper tropospheric vapor [...]" https://t.co/QZoRNgnVLR https://t.co/GG2SEcIQ52 https://t.co/92rCCszaSV
@Ceist8 isn't this it? https://t.co/P4fj9mszVd