↓ Skip to main content

Exact Algorithms for Exact Satisfiability and Number of Perfect Matchings

Overview of attention for article published in Algorithmica, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

1 Q&A thread


36 Dimensions

Readers on

27 Mendeley
1 CiteULike
Exact Algorithms for Exact Satisfiability and Number of Perfect Matchings
Published in
Algorithmica, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00453-007-9149-8

Andreas Björklund, Thore Husfeldt

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 2 7%
Spain 1 4%
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 23 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 19%
Professor 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 70%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Mathematics 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2011.
All research outputs
of 12,228,633 outputs
Outputs from Algorithmica
of 227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 164,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Algorithmica
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,228,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them