↓ Skip to main content

Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
273 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections
Published in
Neuroradiology, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00234-011-0948-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Fischer, Zsolt Vajda, Marta Aguilar Perez, Elisabeth Schmid, Nikolai Hopf, Hansjörg Bäzner, Hans Henkes

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the recently available flow diverter "pipeline embolization device" (PED) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and dissections.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 101 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 22%
Other 20 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 12%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 69%
Unspecified 13 12%
Engineering 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 5 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,639,659
of 12,226,292 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#299
of 559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,676
of 164,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,226,292 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 559 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.