| Title |
Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroradiology, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00234-011-0948-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastian Fischer, Zsolt Vajda, Marta Aguilar Perez, Elisabeth Schmid, Nikolai Hopf, Hansjörg Bäzner, Hans Henkes |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the recently available flow diverter "pipeline embolization device" (PED) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and dissections. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 24% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 58% |
| Engineering | 14 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,281,593
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#745
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,550
of 125,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.