| Title |
Trains of thought on the tabletop: visualizing association of ideas improves creativity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00779-013-0726-3 |
| Authors |
Amandine Afonso Jaco, Stéphanie Buisine, Jessy Barré, Améziane Aoussat, Frédéric Vernier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 52% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 13 | 42% |
| Psychology | 7 | 23% |
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Design | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,281,593
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
#513
of 1,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,725
of 210,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.