↓ Skip to main content

Oral Microbiome and Nitric Oxide: the Missing Link in the Management of Blood Pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 796)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
40 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
6 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Oral Microbiome and Nitric Oxide: the Missing Link in the Management of Blood Pressure
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11906-017-0725-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan S. Bryan, Gena Tribble, Nikola Angelov

Abstract

Having high blood pressure puts you at risk for heart disease and stroke, which are leading causes of death in the USA and worldwide. One out of every three Americans has hypertension, and it is estimated that despite aggressive treatment with medications, only about half of those medicated have managed blood pressure. Recent discoveries of the oral microbiome that reduces inorganic nitrate to nitrite and nitric oxide provide a new therapeutic target for the management of hypertension. The presence or absence of select and specific bacteria may determine steady-state blood pressure levels. Eradication of oral bacteria through antiseptic mouthwash or overuse of antibiotics causes blood pressure to increase. Allowing recolonization of nitrate- and nitrite-reducing bacteria can normalize blood pressure. This review will provide evidence of the link between oral microbiota and the production of nitric oxide and regulation of systemic blood pressure. Management of systemic hypertension through maintenance of the oral microbiome is a completely new paradigm in cardiovascular medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Master 17 11%
Other 15 10%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 46 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#665,221
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#25
of 796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,521
of 324,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.