↓ Skip to main content

The authoring software tool in digital literature as a vector of the global imaginary

Overview of attention for article published in Neohelicon, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The authoring software tool in digital literature as a vector of the global imaginary
Published in
Neohelicon, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11059-017-0377-x
Authors

Odile Farge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,867,942
of 9,424,035 outputs
Outputs from Neohelicon
#15
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,246
of 260,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neohelicon
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,424,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.