↓ Skip to main content

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen for bronchiolitis in a pediatric ward: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen for bronchiolitis in a pediatric ward: a pilot study
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00431-013-2094-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Bressan, Marco Balzani, Baruch Krauss, Andrea Pettenazzo, Stefania Zanconato, Eugenio Baraldi

Abstract

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a widely used ventilatory support in children with bronchiolitis in the intensive care setting. No data is available on HFNC use in the general pediatric ward. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of HFNC oxygen therapy in infants hospitalized in a pediatric ward for moderate-severe bronchiolitis and to assess the changes in ventilatory parameters before and after starting HFNC support. This prospective observational pilot study was carried out during the bronchiolitis season 2011-2012 in a pediatric tertiary care academic center in Italy. Interruptions of HFNC therapy and possible side effects or escalation to other forms of respiratory support were recorded. Oxygen saturation (SpO2), end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), and respiratory rate (RR), measured for a baseline period of 1 h before and at specific time intervals in 48 h after the start of HFNC were recorded. Twenty-seven infants were included (median age 1.3 months; absolute range 0.3-8.5). No adverse events, no premature HFNC therapy termination, and no escalation to other forms of respiratory support were recorded. Median SpO2 significantly increased by 1-2 points after changing from standard oxygen to HFNC (p <0.001). Median ETCO2 and RR rapidly decreased by 6-8 mmHg and 13-20 breaths per minute, respectively, in the first 3 h of HFNC therapy (p <0.001) and remained steady thereafter. Conclusions: Use of HFNC for oxygen administration is feasible for infants with moderate-severe bronchiolitis in a general pediatric ward. In these children, HFNC therapy improves oxygen saturation levels and seems to be associated with a decrease in both ETCO2 and RR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 201 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Postgraduate 26 13%
Other 25 12%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 39 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Engineering 3 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Unspecified 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 50 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,796,786
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#410
of 3,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,259
of 199,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.