Then together with Haixin we published a paper arguing that coauthorship should be organised in a flat egalitarian fashion, and it is comparatively less important that each individual buys everything and more that the group as a whole affirms each claim.
RT @lastpositivist: @BommerBommer @RemcoHeesen I'm a big fan of collaboration! My other published paper with Remco (and another friend and…
RT @PhilSciArchive: A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers https://t.co/JHZp7q6Dcg
RT @PhilSciArchive: A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers https://t.co/JHZp7q6Dcg
A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers https://t.co/JHZp7q6Dcg
More OA journal articles! Read about "Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers" today: https://t.co/k1SGZ1eTiT
RT @lastpositivist: In this (open access!) paper we argue: commonly accepted scientific norms suggest rules for how cooperating scientists…
How should co-authors figure out what to say when they disagree? Current and former students of mine, discuss this in the journal Erkenntnis. https://t.co/VBYwXRvhjP https://t.co/jphgD2AA3U
A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers https://t.co/DBiJmvi9Ic
A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers https://t.co/i7e4wXnfyX