↓ Skip to main content

Subsessila turbinata gen. et. sp. nov. (Beltraniaceae), a Beltrania-like fungus from Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in Mycological Progress, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Subsessila turbinata gen. et. sp. nov. (Beltraniaceae), a Beltrania-like fungus from Thailand
Published in
Mycological Progress, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11557-017-1279-z
Authors

Chuan-Gen Lin, Dong-Qin Dai, Darbhe J. Bhat, Kevin D. Hyde, Li-Zhou Tang, Chaiwat To-anun

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Other 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 63%
Unspecified 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,010,574
of 9,240,924 outputs
Outputs from Mycological Progress
#227
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,919
of 259,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycological Progress
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,240,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.