↓ Skip to main content

Plagiarism, salami slicing, and Lobachevsky

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Plagiarism, salami slicing, and Lobachevsky
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00256-008-0599-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonard Berlin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 11%
Chemistry 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Other 7 26%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,463,719
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#433
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,899
of 89,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.