↓ Skip to main content

Microglia actions in Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
Title
Microglia actions in Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00401-013-1182-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Prokop, Kelly R. Miller, Frank L. Heppner

Abstract

The identification of microglia-associated, neurological disease-causing mutations in patients, combined with studies in mouse models has highlighted microglia, the brain's intrinsic myeloid cells, as key modulators of pathogenesis and disease progression in neurodegenerative diseases. In Alzheimer's disease (AD) in particular, the activation and accumulation of microglial cells around β-Amyloid (Aβ) plaques has long been described and is believed to result in chronic neuroinflammation-a term that, despite being commonly used, lacks a precise definition. This seemingly directed response of microglia to amyloid deposits conflicts with the fact that the increasing buildup of Aβ plaques is not inhibited by these cells during disease progression. While recent evidence suggests that microglia lose their intrinsic beneficial function during the course of AD and may even acquire a "toxic" phenotype over time, Aβ may also simply not be an appropriate trigger to induce phagocytosis and degradation by microglia in vivo. As recent experimental evidence has indicated the importance of the microglia in AD pathogenesis, future efforts aimed at tackling this disease via utilization or modulation of microglia or factors therefrom appear to be an exciting and challenging research front.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 333 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 22%
Student > Master 58 17%
Researcher 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 55 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 24%
Neuroscience 64 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 5%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 69 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,234,813
of 23,590,588 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,357
of 2,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,279
of 206,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,590,588 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.