↓ Skip to main content

Advances in treatment for relapses and refractory multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Oncology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Advances in treatment for relapses and refractory multiple myeloma
Published in
Medical Oncology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12032-009-9407-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiffany Richards, Donna Weber

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Other 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Psychology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,523,962
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Medical Oncology
#261
of 1,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,717
of 94,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Oncology
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.