↓ Skip to main content

Initiating Negotiations: The Role of Machiavellianism, Risk Propensity, and Bargaining Power

Overview of attention for article published in Group Decision & Negotiation, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Initiating Negotiations: The Role of Machiavellianism, Risk Propensity, and Bargaining Power
Published in
Group Decision & Negotiation, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10726-012-9306-6
Authors

Ilias Kapoutsis, Roger J. Volkema, Andreas G. Nikolopoulos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Namibia 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 8 24%
Psychology 8 24%
Unspecified 4 12%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 9%
Other 7 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2013.
All research outputs
#9,839,008
of 12,320,043 outputs
Outputs from Group Decision & Negotiation
#63
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,948
of 160,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Decision & Negotiation
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,320,043 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.