↓ Skip to main content

Does familial risk for alcohol use disorder predict alcohol hangover?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Does familial risk for alcohol use disorder predict alcohol hangover?
Published in
Psychopharmacology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00213-017-4585-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Stephens, Kara Holloway, James A. Grange, Lauren Owen, Kate Jones, Darren Kruisselbrink

Abstract

Positive family history of alcohol use disorder (FHP), a variable associated with propensity for alcohol use disorder (AUD), has been linked with elevated hangover frequency and severity, after controlling for alcohol use. This implies that hangover experiences may be related to AUD. However, inadequate control of alcohol consumption levels, low alcohol dose and testing for hangover during the intoxication phase detract from these findings. Here, we present further data pertinent to understanding the relationship between family history and alcohol hangover. Study 1 compared past year hangover frequency in a survey of 24 FHP and 118 family history negative (FHN) individuals. Study 2 applied a quasi-experimental naturalistic approach assessing concurrent hangover severity in 17 FHP and 32 FHN individuals the morning after drinking alcohol. Both studies applied statistical control for alcohol consumption levels. In Study 1, both FHP status and estimated blood alcohol concentration on the heaviest drinking evening of the past month predicted the frequency of hangover symptoms experienced over the previous 12 months. In Study 2, estimated blood alcohol concentration the previous evening predicted hangover severity but FHP status did not. FHP, indicating familial risk for AUD, was not associated with concurrent hangover severity but was associated with increased estimates of hangover frequency the previous year.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 18%
Psychology 4 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#659,090
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#170
of 5,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,365
of 308,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#4
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.