↓ Skip to main content

Shellfish-Borne Viral Outbreaks: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Food and Environmental Virology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 154)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Shellfish-Borne Viral Outbreaks: A Systematic Review
Published in
Food and Environmental Virology, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12560-012-9097-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Bellou, P. Kokkinos, A. Vantarakis

Abstract

Investigations of disease outbreaks linked to shellfish consumption have been reported in the scientific literature; however, only few countries systematically collate and report such data through a disease surveillance system. We conducted a systematic review to investigate shellfish-borne viral outbreaks and to explore their distribution in different countries, and to determine if different types of shellfish and viruses are implicated. Six databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Eurosurveillance Journal and Spingerlink electronic Journal) and a global electronic reporting system (ProMED) were searched from 1980 to July 2012. About 359 shellfish-borne viral outbreaks, alongside with nine ProMED reports, involving shellfish consumption, were identified. The majority of the reported outbreaks were located in East Asia, followed by Europe, America, Oceania, Australia and Africa. More than half of the outbreaks (63.6 %) were reported from Japan. The most common viral pathogens involved were norovirus (83.7 %) and hepatitis A virus (12.8 %). The most frequent type of consumed shellfish which was involved in outbreaks was oysters (58.4 %). Outbreaks following shellfish consumption were often attributed to water contamination by sewage and/or undercooking. Differences in reporting of outbreaks were seen between the scientific literature and ProMED. Consumption of contaminated shellfish represents a risk to public health in both developed and developing countries, but impact will be disproportionate and likely to compound existing health disparities.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Unspecified 9 13%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Unspecified 15 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Environmental Science 6 9%
Other 16 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,491,105
of 12,985,916 outputs
Outputs from Food and Environmental Virology
#25
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,649
of 161,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food and Environmental Virology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,985,916 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them