↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Active Management of Financial Conflicts of Interest on the Editorial Board of CORR

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Editorial: Active Management of Financial Conflicts of Interest on the Editorial Board of CORR
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3279-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth S. Leopold, Lee Beadling, Matthew B. Dobbs, Mark C. Gebhardt, Paul A. Lotke, Clare M. Rimnac, Montri D. Wongworawat

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,736
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,562
of 213,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#80
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.