↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Active Management of Financial Conflicts of Interest on the Editorial Board of CORR

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Editorial: Active Management of Financial Conflicts of Interest on the Editorial Board of CORR
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3279-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth S. Leopold MD, Lee Beadling BA, Matthew B. Dobbs MD, Mark C. Gebhardt MD, Paul A. Lotke MD, Clare M. Rimnac PhD, Montri D. Wongworawat MD

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,386,009
of 6,237,119 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,240
of 3,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,845
of 109,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#58
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,237,119 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,066 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.