@CarbonBrief @DrSimEvans @hausfath Some of us need to develop solutions, not just model politically desirable scenarios no one can implement because, most fundamentally, in the international system no political and legal implementation processes exist. RC
RT @RogerPielkeJr: RCP4.5 is a scenario that includes climate policy which alters the world's trajectory from a 7.0 W/m^2 trajectory in the…
RCP4.5 is a scenario that includes climate policy which alters the world's trajectory from a 7.0 W/m^2 trajectory in the GCAM reference scenario https://t.co/k88GDRVTjE https://t.co/IdjefPSlDW
@Wade43265670 既然您都这么说了,那我给外宾提供几个链接好了:IPCC第五次评估的中文版本报告: https://t.co/hUjN7O7l12 RCP4.5路径的文章:https://t.co/6POWluNEc3 RCP所依赖的综合气候评估模型手册: https://t.co/P02q3uretL
@Tutkija5 RCP kokonaispakote vuodelle 2011 ~2.4 W/m2 (https://t.co/laSMxpOg0M) IPCC AR5 kokonaispakot vuodelle 2011 olisi 2.23. Toinen selitys on että CMIP5 ilmastoherkkyys on korkeampi kuin mitä oikealla ilmastolla on.
@kbo1978 95% reduktion: https://t.co/53uhVCqjmH Ca. 525 ppm for CO2 og 650 ppm for CO2æ: https://t.co/T0bj28sdVo
@RogerPielkeJr @Peters_Glen @DetlefvanVuuren I'm not sure we are disagreeing here; RCP4.5 is consistent with a very low baseline scenario, but the specific model run used to generate the scenario was a mitigation run. Here is the paper outlining the GCAM r
https://t.co/YuhHCYuReS RCP4.5: a #pathway for #stabilization of #radiative #forcing by 2100
@plato_qnpress @aeberman12 @cyndi_hubach I envision a modified RCP4.5 as a reasonable pathway, but with more nuclear energy and less biofuels. Here's the paper describing it https://t.co/4gfsUaR8Ze
@JohnDPMorgan @BraveNewClimate Impressive notes! This article he cites is also worth reading. http://t.co/s5K7UjZl3C
@JohnDPMorgan @BraveNewClimate Impressive notes! This article he cites is also worth reading. http://t.co/s5K7UjZl3C
@JohnDPMorgan @BraveNewClimate Impressive notes! This article he cites is also worth reading. http://t.co/s5K7UjZl3C