↓ Skip to main content

Near-field structure of underexpanded elliptic jets

Overview of attention for article published in Experiments in Fluids, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Near-field structure of underexpanded elliptic jets
Published in
Experiments in Fluids, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00348-013-1578-3
Authors

Daniel M. Mitchell, Damon R. Honnery, Julio Soria

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 33%
Professor 4 19%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 81%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Energy 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2013.
All research outputs
#9,770,712
of 12,227,808 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#427
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,405
of 158,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,227,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.