↓ Skip to main content

The Initial Trauma Center Fluid Management of Penetrating Injury: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
The Initial Trauma Center Fluid Management of Penetrating Injury: A Systematic Review
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3122-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole M. Tapia, James Suliburk, Kenneth L. Mattox

Abstract

Damage-control resuscitation is the prevailing trauma resuscitation technique that emphasizes early and aggressive transfusion with balanced ratios of red blood cells (RBCs), plasma (FFP), and platelets (Plt) while minimizing crystalloid resuscitation, which is a departure from Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines. It is unclear whether the newer approach is superior to the approach recommended by ATLS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Romania 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 23%
Other 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 75%
Unspecified 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2013.
All research outputs
#10,541,600
of 13,234,387 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,678
of 5,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,087
of 162,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#92
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,234,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,415 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.