| Title |
Handwriting as an objective tool for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-013-6996-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Rosenblum, Margalit Samuel, Sharon Zlotnik, Ilana Erikh, Ilana Schlesinger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 158 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 17% |
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 25 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 13% |
| Engineering | 17 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 10% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,331,242
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#168
of 4,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,894
of 178,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.