↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Metastasis, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
256 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Metastasis, January 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1006689719505
Authors

Maria Lelekakis, Jane M. Moseley, T. John Martin, Daphne Hards, Elizabeth Williams, Patricia Ho, Darren Lowen, Jeannie Javni, Fred R. Miller, John Slavin, Robin L. Anderson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 181 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 23%
Researcher 35 19%
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Unspecified 14 7%
Other 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 13%
Unspecified 20 11%
Engineering 12 6%
Other 24 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,327,687
of 12,381,422 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Metastasis
#84
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,166
of 260,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Metastasis
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,381,422 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.