| Title |
Phylogeography of the Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa: substructuring revealed by mtDNA control region sequences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-008-0316-8 |
| Authors |
Jacob Höglund, Tomas Johansson, Albert Beintema, Hans Schekkerman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 65% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,724,657
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#243
of 1,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,106
of 82,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them