@BRKeogh This might help (if you need a source to cite at some moment to justify/explain why you're not anonymizing) - https://t.co/oEqLIxHPJJ
I’d be interested to hear your thoughts about how you would handle levels of ‘disguise’ (as Bruckman puts it) for social media research. https://t.co/H7mANt4aiP
...A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet https://t.co/ym4KmIvuUr cc: @profpeaton
"we can no longer view “published”+“unpublished” as a binary distinction. Instead, it is now a continuum."@asbruckman http://t.co/1pu3IYHt5h
"we can no longer view “published”+“unpublished” as a binary distinction. Instead, it is now a continuum."@asbruckman http://t.co/1pu3IYHt5h
"Most work on the Internet is “semi-published.”" - @asbruckman's Studying the amateur artist http://t.co/1pu3IYHt5h
"we can no longer view “published”+“unpublished” as a binary distinction. Instead, it is now a continuum."@asbruckman http://t.co/1pu3IYHt5h
One of the best papers I've read: "...disguising data collected in #humansubjects research on the Internet": http://t.co/1pu3IYHt5h #ethics