↓ Skip to main content

Physiological repair of inguinal hernia: a new technique (study of 860 patients)

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Physiological repair of inguinal hernia: a new technique (study of 860 patients)
Published in
Hernia, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10029-005-0039-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. P. Desarda

Abstract

The author has developed a new operation technique based on the physiological principle that provides dynamic posterior wall for inguinal hernia repair. Results of the first series of 400 patients were published in 2001 (ANZ J Surg 71:241-244, 2001). Now the author has described the results of the second series of 860 patients having 920 hernias with follow-up for more than 7 years. An undetached strip of the external oblique aponeurosis (EOA) is sutured to the inguinal ligament below and the muscle arch above, behind the cord, to form a new posterior wall. External oblique muscle gives additional strength to the weakened muscle arch to keep this strip physiologically dynamic. In this prospective study, 920 inguinal hernia repairs were performed between August 1990 and December 2003 in 860 patients. Follow-up was done for 7 years. The main outcome measure was early and late morbidities and especially recurrence in a long-term follow-up. Mean patient age was 50.5 years (range 18-90). A total of 851 (98.95%) patients were operated under local or regional anesthesia; 838 (97.4%) patients were ambulatory with limited movements in 6 h and free movements in 18-24 h; 792 (92%) patients had a hospital stay of one night and 840 (97.6%) patients returned to normal activities within 1-2 weeks. Hematoma formation requiring drainage was observed in one patient, while seven patients had wound edema during the postoperative period which subsided on its own. Follow-up was completed in 623 patients (72.5 %) by clinical examination or questionnaire. The median follow-up period was 7.8 years (range 1-12 years). There was no recurrence of hernia or postoperative neuralgia. This operation is simple to perform, does not require foreign body like a mesh or complicated dissection of the inguinal floor as in Bassini/Shouldice. It has shown excellent results with virtually zero recurrence rates.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 11 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 69%
Engineering 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Psychology 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,521,954
of 12,539,406 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#106
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,738
of 155,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,539,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.