↓ Skip to main content

Barefoot Running: Does It Prevent Injuries?

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
81 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
Title
Barefoot Running: Does It Prevent Injuries?
Published in
Sports Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0093-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly Murphy, Emily J. Curry, Elizabeth G. Matzkin

Abstract

Endurance running has evolved over the course of millions of years and it is now one of the most popular sports today. However, the risk of stress injury in distance runners is high because of the repetitive ground impact forces exerted. These injuries are not only detrimental to the runner, but also place a burden on the medical community. Preventative measures are essential to decrease the risk of injury within the sport. Common running injuries include patellofemoral pain syndrome, tibial stress fractures, plantar fasciitis, and Achilles tendonitis. Barefoot running, as opposed to shod running (with shoes), has recently received significant attention in both the media and the market place for the potential to promote the healing process, increase performance, and decrease injury rates. However, there is controversy over the use of barefoot running to decrease the overall risk of injury secondary to individual differences in lower extremity alignment, gait patterns, and running biomechanics. While barefoot running may benefit certain types of individuals, differences in running stance and individual biomechanics may actually increase injury risk when transitioning to barefoot running. The purpose of this article is to review the currently available clinical evidence on barefoot running and its effectiveness for preventing injury in the runner. Based on a review of current literature, barefoot running is not a substantiated preventative running measure to reduce injury rates in runners. However, barefoot running utility should be assessed on an athlete-specific basis to determine whether barefoot running will be beneficial.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 331 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 102 29%
Student > Master 66 19%
Student > Postgraduate 32 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Researcher 25 7%
Other 73 21%
Unknown 23 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 107 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 103 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 7%
Engineering 12 3%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 35 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#192,971
of 13,697,252 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#211
of 2,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,478
of 159,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,697,252 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.