↓ Skip to main content

Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Sciences Europe, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project
Published in
Environmental Sciences Europe, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12302-017-0111-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Foss Hansen, Sara Nørgaard Sørensen, Lars Michael Skjolding, Nanna B. Hartmann, Anders Baun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Professor 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Chemistry 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#243
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,538
of 324,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.