↓ Skip to main content

Trends in Primary Care Clinician Perceptions of a New Electronic Health Record

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Trends in Primary Care Clinician Perceptions of a New Electronic Health Record
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11606-009-0906-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert El-Kareh, Tejal K. Gandhi, Eric G. Poon, Lisa P. Newmark, Jonathan Ungar, Stuart Lipsitz, Thomas D. Sequist

Abstract

Clinician perceptions of a newly implemented electronic health record play an important role in its success or failure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 7%
Canada 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 92 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 12%
Unspecified 8 7%
Other 31 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 35%
Computer Science 24 22%
Unspecified 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Other 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,200,405
of 7,800,879 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#910
of 3,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,151,530
of 7,177,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#905
of 3,343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,800,879 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,177,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.