Title |
Targeted genome engineering in human induced pluripotent stem cells by penetrating TALENs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cell Regeneration, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2045-9769-2-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Renli Ru, Yongchao Yao, Songlin Yu, Benpeng Yin, Wanwan Xu, Siting Zhao, Li Qin, Xiaoping Chen |
Abstract |
Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) have been successfully used to knock out endogenous genes in stem cell research. However, the deficiencies of current gene-based delivery systems may hamper the clinical application of these nucleases. A new delivery method that can improve the utility of these nucleases is needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 27% |
Researcher | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 17% |
Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,060,816
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cell Regeneration
#17
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,410
of 209,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Regeneration
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.