| Title |
A Review of Emergency Cardiopulmonary Bypass for Severe Poisoning by Cardiotoxic Drugs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Toxicology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13181-012-0281-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas J. Johnson, David F. Gaieski, Steven R. Allen, Jeanmarie Perrone, Francis DeRoos |
| Abstract |
Cardiovascular collapse remains a leading cause of death in severe acute drug intoxication. Commonly prescribed medications such as antidysrhythmics, calcium channel antagonists, and beta adrenergic receptor antagonists can cause refractory cardiovascular collapse in massive overdose. Emergency cardiopulmonary bypass (ECPB), a modality originating in cardiac surgery, is a rescue technique that has been successfully implemented in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest unresponsive to traditional medical interventions. More recently a growing number of animal studies, case reports, and case series have documented its use in refractory hemodynamic collapse in poisoned patients. This article will review current ECPB techniques and explore its growing role in the treatment of severely hemodynamically compromised poisoned patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 23% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 26% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 24% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 76% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#999,447
of 24,288,381 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#60
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,058
of 287,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Toxicology
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,288,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.