| Title |
Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-013-9190-z |
| Authors |
Nicholas S. Fitz, Roland Nadler, Praveena Manogaran, Eugene W. J. Chong, Peter B. Reiner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,322,350
of 24,169,085 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#120
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,243
of 204,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,169,085 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.