↓ Skip to main content

Performance analysis and working fluid selection for geothermal energy-powered organic Rankine-vapor compression air conditioning

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Performance analysis and working fluid selection for geothermal energy-powered organic Rankine-vapor compression air conditioning
Published in
Geothermal Energy, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/2195-9706-1-2
Authors

Xianbiao Bu, Lingbao Wang, Huashan Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 39%
Energy 6 13%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2013.
All research outputs
#18,345,822
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#109
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,675
of 199,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.