↓ Skip to main content

Performance analysis and working fluid selection for geothermal energy-powered organic Rankine-vapor compression air conditioning

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Performance analysis and working fluid selection for geothermal energy-powered organic Rankine-vapor compression air conditioning
Published in
Geothermal Energy, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/2195-9706-1-2
Authors

Xianbiao Bu, Lingbao Wang, Huashan Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 42%
Energy 5 16%
Chemistry 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2013.
All research outputs
#3,036,996
of 4,508,612 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#20
of 32 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,334
of 93,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,508,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them