@ArchivesMaarja Probably not specifically in this case, but here's a general article on the effect retraction has on belief: https://t.co/21goMQEgpm
@etzpcm @AJCorner @RichardTol Adam is all too predictable http://t.co/oSLnYG2scX
@ivanoransky relevant to RW "Article retracted, but the message lives on" http://t.co/oSLnYG2scX h/t @lucialiljegren
Se retracta el paper que mostró datos inventados, pero el mensaje pervive http://t.co/40vGwpMDl7
Se retracta el paper que mostró datos inventados, pero el mensaje pervive http://t.co/40vGwpMDl7
Se retracta el paper que mostró datos inventados, pero el mensaje pervive http://t.co/40vGwpMDl7
Se retracta el paper que mostró datos inventados, pero el mensaje pervive http://t.co/40vGwpMDl7
Not encouraging: "Article retracted, but the message lives on" http://t.co/Q6Yyz9pDr4
Article retracted, but the message lives on http://t.co/dkGxvOnzKU
People still believe results after learning an article was retracted (PsychBull&Review, SpringerPaywall): http://t.co/rKt1v92FiS
People still believe results after learning an article was retracted (PsychBull&Review, SpringerPaywall): http://t.co/rKt1v92FiS
People still believe results after learning an article was retracted (PsychBull&Review, SpringerPaywall): http://t.co/rKt1v92FiS
People still believe results after learning an article was retracted (PsychBull&Review, SpringerPaywall): http://t.co/rKt1v92FiS
Article retracted, but the message lives on http://t.co/sPJK6nwjl3
Studie: Wer einmal was glaubt, glaubt das weiter auch wenn die Fakten dagegen sprechen. Sieht man beim #Passivrauch. http://t.co/4HcQm8syfS
Studie: Wer einmal was glaubt, glaubt das weiter auch wenn die Fakten dagegen sprechen. Sieht man beim #Passivrauch. http://t.co/4HcQm8syfS
You have an opinion? Just ignore the facts! Belief perseverance, or why misinformation is so distressingly effective: http://t.co/tETJiTsckJ
People still partially believe in a scientific message, even after being told that the paper was retracted http://t.co/ROAqCyYoUK Worrying!
People still partially believe in a scientific message, even after being told that the paper was retracted http://t.co/ROAqCyYoUK Worrying!
People still partially believe in a scientific message, even after being told that the paper was retracted http://t.co/ROAqCyYoUK Worrying!
People still partially believe in a scientific message, even after being told that the paper was retracted http://t.co/ROAqCyYoUK Worrying!
People still partially believe in a scientific message, even after being told that the paper was retracted http://t.co/ROAqCyYoUK Worrying!
People still partially believe in a scientific message, even after being told that the paper was retracted http://t.co/ROAqCyYoUK Worrying!
People still partially believe in a scientific message, even after being told that the paper was retracted http://t.co/ROAqCyYoUK Worrying!
People still partially believe in a scientific message, even after being told that the paper was retracted http://t.co/ROAqCyYoUK Worrying!
People still partially believe in a scientific message, even after being told that the paper was retracted http://t.co/ROAqCyYoUK Worrying!
People still partially believe in a scientific message, even after being told that the paper was retracted http://t.co/ROAqCyYoUK Worrying!
人は科学データが捏造されていたと分かっても研究成果を信じてしまう(vs. データなし)。論議の利用可能性が媒介。 Article retracted, but the message lives on http://t.co/xqWNYuJhS5
人は科学データが捏造されていたと分かっても研究成果を信じてしまう(vs. データなし)。論議の利用可能性が媒介。 Article retracted, but the message lives on http://t.co/xqWNYuJhS5