| Title |
Personal values, subjective well-being and destination-loyalty intention of international students
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40064-016-2439-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. L. Jamaludin, D. L. Sam, G. M. Sandal, A. A. Adam |
| Abstract |
What are the factors that predict international students' destination-loyalty intention? This is the main question this paper addresses, using an online survey among 396 (short-term, N = 182) and (long-term, N = 214) international students at a Norwegian university. Structural equation model-AMOS was conducted to examine relationships among personal values, subjective well-being and destination-loyalty intentions. The results showed that: (1) universalism was positively related to subjective well-being for short-term students; and (2) subjective well-being was positively related to destination-loyalty intention for all groups. We found that relatively stable and happy individuals might be important for ensuring destination-loyalty intentions. Results also indicated that personal values that emphasize justice and equity are also important for short-term international students' well-being. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 18% |
| Psychology | 15 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,536,772
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,266
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,956
of 353,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#156
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.