↓ Skip to main content

Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,616)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2009
DOI 10.3758/pbr.16.2.252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Russell, Brad Duchaine, Ken Nakayama

Abstract

We tested 4 people who claimed to have significantly better than ordinary face recognition ability. Exceptional ability was confirmed in each case. On two very different tests of face recognition, all 4 experimental subjects performed beyond the range of control subject performance. They also scored significantly better than average on a perceptual discrimination test with faces. This effect was larger with upright than with inverted faces, and the 4 subjects showed a larger "inversion effect" than did control subjects, who in turn showed a larger inversion effect than did developmental prosopagnosics. This result indicates an association between face recognition ability and the magnitude of the inversion effect. Overall, these "super-recognizers" are about as good at face recognition and perception as developmental prosopagnosics are bad. Our findings demonstrate the existence of people with exceptionally good face recognition ability and show that the range of face recognition and face perception ability is wider than has been previously acknowledged.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 269 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 23%
Student > Bachelor 65 22%
Student > Master 37 12%
Researcher 37 12%
Professor 20 7%
Other 70 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 198 66%
Unspecified 25 8%
Neuroscience 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 31 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 393. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#25,540
of 13,257,145 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#6
of 1,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283
of 158,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,257,145 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.