RT @IrisVanRooij: 14. Scott, A., Stege, U. & van Rooij, I. (2011). Minesweeper may not be NP-complete but is hard nonetheless. The Mathem…
RT @IrisVanRooij: 14. Scott, A., Stege, U. & van Rooij, I. (2011). Minesweeper may not be NP-complete but is hard nonetheless. The Mathem…
RT @IrisVanRooij: 14. Scott, A., Stege, U. & van Rooij, I. (2011). Minesweeper may not be NP-complete but is hard nonetheless. The Mathem…
skill issue
14. Scott, A., Stege, U. & van Rooij, I. (2011). Minesweeper may not be NP-complete but is hard nonetheless. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 33(4), 5-17. https://t.co/kCwiaJS2IU
RT @IrisVanRooij: While I love Kaye's paper, I must disagree with his title. Allan Scott, Ulrike Stege and myself proved in this paper that…
RT @IrisVanRooij: While I love Kaye's paper, I must disagree with his title. Allan Scott, Ulrike Stege and myself proved in this paper that…
While I love Kaye's paper, I must disagree with his title. Allan Scott, Ulrike Stege and myself proved in this paper that the game is unlikely NP-complete: https://t.co/iOVj2GmwGQ Proving that the game is (NP-)hard requires a different proof than the one
RT @IrisVanRooij: @venpopov Paper I most enjoyed writing: “Minesweeper may not be NP-complete but is hard nonetheless” in Mathematical In…
RT @IrisVanRooij: @venpopov Paper I most enjoyed writing: “Minesweeper may not be NP-complete but is hard nonetheless” in Mathematical In…
@venpopov Paper I most enjoyed writing: “Minesweeper may not be NP-complete but is hard nonetheless” in Mathematical Intelligencer https://t.co/YkuHcnl8AA It uses a well-known game (Minesweeper) to bring concepts from complexity theory to a broader aud
@encorestage https://t.co/lXCISlbTqp here's the link for the sake of it but I couldn't accept the full article without having a legit means of getting it