↓ Skip to main content

Microgeographic call variation in a non-learning species, the Corncrake (Crex crex)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Microgeographic call variation in a non-learning species, the Corncrake (Crex crex)
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10336-017-1438-7
Authors

Michał Budka, Tomasz S. Osiejuk

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Costa Rica 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Unspecified 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 52%
Unspecified 6 21%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Psychology 2 7%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,974,680
of 9,143,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#674
of 834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,349
of 253,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,143,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.