| Title |
Parametric and cadaveric models of lumbar flexion instability and flexion restricting dynamic stabilization system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-013-2934-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louis C. Fielding, Todd F. Alamin, Leonard I. Voronov, Gerard Carandang, Robert M. Havey, Avinash G. Patwardhan |
| Abstract |
Development of a dynamic stabilization system often involves costly and time-consuming design iterations, testing and computational modeling. The aims of this study were (1) develop a simple parametric model of lumbar flexion instability and use this model to identify the appropriate stiffness of a flexion restricting stabilization system (FRSS), and (2) in a cadaveric experiment, validate the predictive value of the parametric model. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 29% |
| Engineering | 12 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2013.
All research outputs
#18,343,746
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,457
of 4,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,416
of 198,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#28
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.