↓ Skip to main content

Parametric and cadaveric models of lumbar flexion instability and flexion restricting dynamic stabilization system

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Parametric and cadaveric models of lumbar flexion instability and flexion restricting dynamic stabilization system
Published in
European Spine Journal, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00586-013-2934-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louis C. Fielding, Todd F. Alamin, Leonard I. Voronov, Gerard Carandang, Robert M. Havey, Avinash G. Patwardhan

Abstract

Development of a dynamic stabilization system often involves costly and time-consuming design iterations, testing and computational modeling. The aims of this study were (1) develop a simple parametric model of lumbar flexion instability and use this model to identify the appropriate stiffness of a flexion restricting stabilization system (FRSS), and (2) in a cadaveric experiment, validate the predictive value of the parametric model.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 20%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Engineering 8 32%
Unspecified 4 16%
Computer Science 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 2 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2013.
All research outputs
#9,766,562
of 12,221,286 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,704
of 3,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,440
of 151,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#33
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,221,286 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.