↓ Skip to main content

Disciplinary epistemologies, generic attributes and undergraduate academic writing in nursing and midwifery

Overview of attention for article published in Higher Education, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Disciplinary epistemologies, generic attributes and undergraduate academic writing in nursing and midwifery
Published in
Higher Education, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10734-011-9447-6
Authors

Julio Gimenez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Lecturer 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 32%
Linguistics 6 16%
Unspecified 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Other 9 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2011.
All research outputs
#2,445,140
of 4,729,490 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#244
of 403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,946,359
of 3,623,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#234
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,729,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,623,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.