↓ Skip to main content

Lead and other metals can substitute for Ca2+ in calmodulin

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, September 1983
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Lead and other metals can substitute for Ca2+ in calmodulin
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, September 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00277816
Authors

E. Habermann, K. Crowell, P. Janicki

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Other 4 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2007.
All research outputs
#1,738,264
of 7,299,963 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#205
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,183
of 89,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,299,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them