@theresphysics @wim_carton I read Matthews, Zickfeld 2017 paper https://t.co/gz56MkWyBC describing newly-enlarged carbon budget by way of non-CO2 component reductions, but don't see how the "no baked in" claim fits with long-tail CO2 modeling. 1/N https://
@DrSimEvans Yes, I know, I wasn't talking about the lifetime of an individual CO2 molecule. I meant that cumulative emissions might be ok for global CO2 budgets, it is problematic if allocating responsibility to individual countries for climate damages, s
@cbcJillDempsey @metromorning @TheCurrentCBC @CCPA_BC @CBCNews @Oliver_Geden @cbcradio @cbcfifth @cbcdocs @Mcdiarmm @kasia_tokarska @KirstenZickfeld Or you could ask @damon_matthews & Dr Zickfeld if they see their newly-calculated carbon budget https:/
RT @OpenResLeeds: Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious Climate Targets (2017) https://t.co/Ob41Gmv71l #wrro #openaccess #climatechange @…
Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious Climate Targets (2017) https://t.co/Ob41Gmv71l #wrro #openaccess #climatechange @piersforster
a mathematical perspective for Carbon Cycle and Climate: https://t.co/pqG4mEcMqX
RT @JariLiski: @puntanenyahoo Eivät ole. Lue https://t.co/mN8Nhof3jC @jmkorhonen
@puntanenyahoo Eivät ole. Lue https://t.co/mN8Nhof3jC @jmkorhonen
Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious Climate Targets https://t.co/eLc01J2Fdr
Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious Climate Targets https://t.co/EDCR66puCm