↓ Skip to main content

Circumstantiation: taking a broader look at circumstantial meanings

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Linguistics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Circumstantiation: taking a broader look at circumstantial meanings
Published in
Functional Linguistics, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40554-016-0036-y
Authors

Shoshana Dreyfus, Isabelle Bennett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 14 54%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,448,169
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Functional Linguistics
#24
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,739
of 311,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Linguistics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.