| Title |
Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Epidemiology, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Stang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,017 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1993 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 286 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 207 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 190 | 9% |
| Researcher | 184 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 134 | 7% |
| Other | 389 | 19% |
| Unknown | 627 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 744 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 114 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 68 | 3% |
| Psychology | 54 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 2% |
| Other | 254 | 13% |
| Unknown | 738 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#826,525
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#118
of 1,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,247
of 105,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.