↓ Skip to main content

The Solar Cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Solar Physics, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
The Solar Cycle
Published in
Living Reviews in Solar Physics, March 2010
DOI 10.12942/lrsp-2010-1
Authors

David H. Hathaway

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Switzerland 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 80 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 27%
Researcher 23 26%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 45 51%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 21%
Engineering 6 7%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 12 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#9,125,123
of 11,400,239 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Solar Physics
#40
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,957
of 136,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Solar Physics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,400,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them